Professional Discipline & Regulation

“He is very well liked in the medical field.” “Knows his area backwards and has good judgement.” “He provides very energetic defence of his clients.” (Chambers & Partners 2021)

“Incredibly bright. He always sees the argument when it may not be immediately apparent.” “A reflective, imaginative and creative barrister, with a very attractive advocacy style. He’s always thinking of new ways in which the law can be deployed.” (Chambers & Partners 2017)

“He is a very, very clever senior junior and was a brilliant member of our legal team as he was approachable, intelligent and pragmatic.” “He’s a delightful opponent who is constantly seeking to push the envelope and find new and innovative arguments. He’s tenacious, enterprising and inventive in terms of his legal analysis, and his written arguments are also presented in an attractive and beguiling manner.” (Chambers & Partners 2016)

He is a first class advocate with an intellectual approach.” (Chambers & Partners 2015)

Selected Cases

  • Re M (2020): Successful appeal against refusal on specialist register of the GMC.
  • Re T (2020): Acted for professor in dispute over restrictions on his employment.
  • Andrew Gregg v North West Anglia NHS Foundation (2019) EWCA Civ 387
  • DP v General Dental Council [2017] 4 WLR 14,
  • NH v General Medical Council [2016] EWHC 2348
  • Stevens v University of Birmingham [2015] EWHC 2300 (QB) [2015] IRLR 899; [2015] Med LR 489
  • Bawa-Garba v General Medical Council [2015] EWHC 1277
  • Fynes v St George’s Hospital NHS Trust [2014] EWHC 756 (QB)
  • Houshian v General Medical Council [2012] EWHC 3458 (QB)
  • Harry v General Medical Council [2012] EWHC 2762
  • R (Patel) v General Medical Council [2012] EWHC 2012 EWHC 2120
  • R (Singapore Medical Council) v General Medical Council [2006] EWHC 3277
View full profile »
Portfolio [0]
Barrister Portfolio
Barristers / Name Call CV Email

Remove All

to email this list of barristers to a colleague.