Cases 
 
Search Resources:
 
Advanced search

 

 

Our privacy policy explains how we use cookies. By using this site, we have assumed your agreement to their use.

Cases

TitleCounsel
Hall v Simons - Fair Trial and forensic immunity
David Balcombe QC
William Edis QC
for the Claimants
 

 

S v Gloucestershire County Council [2000] FLR 825

Appeal allowed against the striking out of a claim by a child alleging sexual abuse by foster parents - H v Norfolk overruled.
Elizabeth-Anne Gumbel QC
For the Claimant
 

 

W v Essex County Council, H of L [2000] 2 WLR 601 and C.A. (1998) 3 WLR 534

House of Lords consideration of liability of a local authority for the placement of a foster child with a foster family, issue as to whether parents primary or secondary victims in respect of psychiatric damage.
Elizabeth-Anne Gumbel QC

 

 

Hall (Arthur J S & Co) v Simons (a firm) (2000) HL

Lawyers' negligence, advocates' immunity from suit abolished.
 

 

 

Nwabueze v General Dental Council - Fair Trial in medical and dental disciplinary tribunals
David Foskett QC
Martin Forde QC
for the Defendant
 

 

Heil -v- Rankin [2000] 2 WLR 1173 [Court of Appeal]

Guidelines for the assessment of damages for pain, suffering and loss of amenity. James Badenoch QC, Lizanne Gumbel QC and Henry Witcomb acted for some of the Claimants. Philip Havers QC acted for the NHSLA.
James Badenoch QC
Elizabeth-Anne Gumbel QC
Henry Witcomb
For some of the Claimants
Philip Havers QC
For the NHSLA
 

Kent -v- London Ambulance Service [1999] Lloyd's Med Rep 58; [1999] Lloyd's Med Rep 424 (Court of Appeal)

Claim against ambulance service for failing to attend in a reasonable time.
Elizabeth-Anne Gumbel QC
For the Claimant
 

 

Briody - Right to Found a Family and damages for clinical negligence
Sally Smith QC
for the Defendants
 

 

An NHS Trust v D & Ors [2000] 2 FLR 677 - Four general principles applied to the court's consideration of an application that involved the non-resuscitation of a severely disabled child in the event of a respiratory and/or cardiac failure and/or arrest: (i) the court's prime and paramount consideration must be for the best interests of the child; (ii) the court had a clear duty for respect for the sanctity of human life; (iii) a course aimed at terminating life or accelerating death could not be approved; and (iv) there could be no question of a court directing a doctor to provide treatment which the doctor was unwilling to give and which was contrary to that doctor's clinical judgment.
Jeremy Hyam

 

 

Barrett v Enfield London Borough Council [1999] 3 WLR 79

Liability of a local authority for a child in care; duty of care and causation found by the House of Lords to be arguable, so a claim for damages for personal injuries could be pursued against the local authority.
Elizabeth-Anne Gumbel QC

 

 

Page: 2 3 Next