Cases>Environment>Flooding Flooding  | Arscott | | The immunity of a land owner from liability in nuisance where under the common enemy rule he took steps to prevent flood waters coming into his land and thereby damaged another’s land, was not a contravention of Articles 8 or Protocol 1 Article 1 |
| | Marcic | | No common law right or right under Article 8 to claim damages from public utility company for flood damage
|
| | Ortiz v Spain | | The delayed payment of compensation to victims of an accident may have breached Article 14 since it discriminated in favour of those who were able to await the outcome of judicial proceedings |
| | Seligman v Poland | | Measures to enforce certain regulations protecting waterways do not infringe landowners' property rights if they are obiged to restore those waterways |
|
| 
